ℹ️ InvestingCube may earn a commission when you sign up through links on this page.

IC Markets vs Pepperstone

Updated Aug 07, 2026, 14:35 BST · Independently reviewed and ranked by our editorial team

Overall Winner

IC Markets

ASICCySEC
9.5/ 10
$200Min. Deposit
1:500Leverage
0 pipsSpread
VS

Pepperstone

ASICCySECDFSA
9.4/ 10
$0Min. Deposit
1:400Leverage
0 pipsSpread
VS

Key Differences

  • IC Markets has the higher overall Editorial Score (9.5 vs 9.4).
  • Pepperstone has the lower minimum deposit ($0 vs $200).
  • IC Markets executes trades faster on average (35 ms vs 45 ms).
  • Pepperstone holds licenses from more regulators (4 vs 2), spreading regulatory risk further.

Head-to-Head Rating Index

FeesPlatformsSafetyResearchSupport
IC MarketsPepperstone

Full Side-by-Side Comparison

Highlighted values mark the better option for that row. Add up to 5 brokers to compare at once.

IC MarketsPepperstone
Editorial Score9.59.4
Trading EnvironmentAAAA
Avg. Execution Speed35 ms45 ms
Minimum Deposit$200$0
Max Leverage1:5001:400
Spread From0 pips0 pips
PlatformscTrader, MT4, MT5, TradingViewcTrader, MT4, MT5, TradingView
RegulationASIC, CySECASIC, CySEC, DFSA, FCA
Get StartedVisitVisit

Comparing IC Markets, Pepperstone side by side across regulation, platforms, fees, and account conditions to help you decide which broker better fits your trading style.